Ucp camouflage series#

These included a number of factories for manufacturing textiles and military uniforms, which continued to produce camouflage uniforms not only for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but for many of its neighbors including Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, and Moldova. Many manufacturing facilities were maintained in Ukraine under Soviet control, and these in turn also transferred ownership with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The Armed Forces of Ukraine (Збройні сили України - ЗСУ) were formed in August of 1991, when jurisdiction over all formations of the old Soviet Armed Forces stationed in Ukraine were transferred under the control of the new republic. Following a failed military coup d'etat that resulted in the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine established its independence on 16 July 1990. Ukraine (Україна) was formerly a socialist republic within the Soviet Union, and the largest country on the European continent.

4 Camouflage Worn by Pro-Russian Militias.

3 Other Camouflage Patterns in Use by Ukrainian Forces.Read more: I t Was the Biggest Scam in Tricare's History. The one exception the Army has dictated pertains to cold-weather gear: Soldiers are permitted to wear OCPs with warm UCP-patterned cold-weather items, according to a 2015 release.Īrmy officials did not respond by deadline to a query about the timeline for fielding OCP-patterned cold-weather items to all units. Starting today, however, all soldiers are required to possess and wear the OCP with T-shirt and belt in 'Tan 499' and boots in coyote brown. 1 is also the retirement date for the blue camouflage Navy Working Uniform Type I, or 'blueberries.' Critics of the uniform joked that the camouflage was only effective when a sailor fell overboard.ĭuring a transition period that began in July 2015, soldiers were permitted to wear UCPs with sand-colored T-shirt, belt and boots. It didn't help matters that the Navy was contending with its own uniform boondoggle. An item in the 2019 NDAA called for the Army to find a way to re-dye its old and useless UCP stocks with new patterns to prevent waste.

A provision in an early version of the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act aimed to stop the Defense Department from developing any new camouflage uniforms without notifying Congress ahead of time.

Ucp camouflage series#

Members of Congress, feeling burned by the whole ordeal, introduced a series of provisions aimed at slowing wasteful spending. 'The Operational Camouflage Pattern was selected following the most comprehensive uniform camouflage testing effort ever undertaken by the Army, reflecting the Army's paramount commitment to force protection,' service officials wrote in a 2015 news release. And the hunt was already on to find a long-term UCP replacement.Īfter five years of testing and evaluation, the service selected the OCP to be the UCP's permanent successor in 2015. With its trendy pattern, the UCP uniform cost a widely reported $5 billion to develop and make, and quickly developed a reputation as a boondoggle.Īs early as 2010, the Army was sending soldiers to Afghanistan in a different camouflage uniform, MultiCam, from Crye Precision.